Today’s technology can make or break a criminal case. Specifically, the ability to identify DNA, which can more easily find people that could be linked to or associated with a crime is a big deal. DNA is one of the primary pieces of evidence forensic investigators will be looking for when they sweep a crime scene. If found, a prosecutor may build a case around it and target the person whose DNA was left behind. Even though DNA can be a robust and convincing piece of evidence against a defendant, it is not always enough to secure a guilty verdict.
In some cases, DNA alone can be convincing and lead to a conviction. In others, a jury is tasked with believing beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant committed a crime in order to convict. If they are not sure and still have some lingering doubts, it could be possible for a defendant with DNA evidence against them to avoid conviction.
Residents of San Diego and the surrounding areas who are arrested should immediately get in touch with professional legal counsel. The San Diego criminal defense attorney David M. Boertje has been devoted to helping individuals mixed up in the criminal justice system fight for the best outcomes, including not guilty verdicts or reduced charges. David M. Boertje knows how to get results.
What Happens if DNA Leads to a Conviction?
When DNA is present, this piece of evidence can be compelling enough for a jury to want to convict. It is not always the situation, but defendants should know that it can be. Even if a guilty verdict is rendered, a defendant is not out of options. A defendant has the right to appeal that verdict and potentially get a better result.
There are several examples in which DNA was a primary reason for a guilty verdict. However, upon appeal, a conviction of a crime was overturned. This is the best possible result of an appeal.
Individuals arrested and charged with crimes can strategically position themselves to secure the most favorable outcomes for their cases when they have experienced legal counsel on their side. When it comes to DNA evidence, this is certainly powerful proof that may show a link to a crime. Though, in the absence of other forms of evidence, it can be hard for a jury to believe that a defendant committed a crime beyond a reasonable doubt and then convict. Should this happen, and there be serious questions and a lack of supplemental evidence to support the DNA exhibit, the defendant may have a case to make that, upon appeal, can overturn their guilty verdict. Continue reading